Key takeaways
- In 28 lab experiments with 1,662 people, checking the same thing over and over sharply lowered confidence in memory, while actual accuracy dropped only a little.
- A 2019 review of 20 studies found that people with more health anxiety search online for health information more, and the link with distressing, repeated searching was much stronger.
- Two 2025 reviews found that people who use diet and fitness apps report more disordered-eating symptoms, but neither could show that the apps cause eating problems.
- For home blood pressure, the American Heart Association advises two readings one minute apart at the same time each day, and three days of morning and evening readings gave a reliable average in one study.
- If logging food or weight starts running your life, call the National Alliance for Eating Disorders helpline at 1-866-662-1235; in a crisis, call or text 988.
In 2003, two Dutch psychologists sat healthy volunteers in front of a computer animation of a gas stove1. One group checked the virtual stove again and again. A comparison group checked virtual light bulbs instead, a task with nothing at stake1.
Checking the stove didn’t make people forget. Their memory of what they had done stayed just as accurate1. But their memories turned fuzzy and less detailed, and their confidence in their own memory fell1.
That odd result has held up. In 2019, a review pooled 28 of these experiments with 1,662 people2. Repeated checking caused large drops in confidence, vividness and detail, plus a small drop in actual accuracy2.
The researchers were studying checking of the kind seen in obsessive-compulsive disorder. But anyone who has rechecked a pulse, a scale or a symptom search may know the pattern.
You check to feel sure, the relief lasts a moment, and then the doubt returns.
Our article on goal tracking showed that monitoring helps people reach health goals. This one covers the other side: monitoring has a helpful dose and a harmful one.
Why checking more can leave you less sure
Psychologists call a habit meant to head off a feared outcome a “safety behavior”34. Rechecking a lock is one, and rechecking your body can be another.
A 2021 review from researchers in Mainz, Germany, argued that web searching works this way for people with health anxiety3. Relief comes some of the time but not every time, a pattern called intermittent reinforcement, and that keeps the habit alive3.
The gas-stove studies suggest a second reason. The Dutch team proposed that each look makes the scene more familiar, so attention slides past the details. A thin, faded memory is easy to doubt, and doubt is exactly what the next check promises to fix1.
Those were lab tasks, not health habits, so the link to body checking is a reasonable inference, not proof. Still, in a Swedish trial for severe health anxiety, the treatment that worked best asked people to stop checking their pulse and to hold off on seeking medical reassurance4.
Seven signs your monitoring has passed the helpful dose
Tracking at a healthy dose answers a question and then gets out of the way, while over-monitoring keeps asking. These signs suggest you’ve crossed the line:
- Relief doesn’t last. A check calms you for minutes, and then you feel pulled to check again.
- You check far more than your plan calls for. Think five blood pressure readings before lunch, or several weigh-ins a day.
- Your sleep got worse after you started tracking it. Our article on sleep trackers covers orthosomnia, the drive for perfect sleep data.
- Your list of foods keeps shrinking. Foods get dropped because they are hard to log, not because they disagree with you.
- Normal ups and downs alarm you. Our articles on glucose sensors and lab ranges explain why most after-meal rises and slightly flagged results are normal.
- Missing data feels risky. You skip a walk because your watch is charging.
- The number outranks your body. You wake up rested, a score says you’re not, and you believe the score.
None of these means something is wrong with you; they mean a tool now costs more than it gives.
Symptom searching and health anxiety feed each other
In 2019, Australian researchers pooled 20 studies with 7,373 people and found that those with more health anxiety did more online health searching5.
The researchers measured this with a correlation, a number from 0 (no link) to 1 (a perfect match). For health anxiety and online searching, it was 0.34, a moderate link5. For health anxiety and cyberchondria, it was much stronger, 0.625.
The German review in 2021 pooled 7 studies with 3,069 people and found almost the same figure, 0.633. It also tied cyberchondria to obsessive-compulsive symptoms and to trouble living with uncertainty3.
A correlation can’t show which comes first: worry may drive searching, or searching may feed worry. The German team argued that each feeds the other in a loop3. The Australian team noted a weak spot: most studies relied on a single questionnaire to measure cyberchondria5.
A search with a clear question and a stopping point can help you prepare for a visit. Trouble starts when the search has no end.
Calorie and fitness apps: a steady link, an unproven cause
In a 2017 study of 105 people treated at a community eating-disorder clinic, about three in four had used MyFitnessPal to count calories6. Of those, 73% said the app had contributed at least somewhat to their eating disorder, and 30% said it had contributed very much6. Those were memories reported after the fact, so they can’t prove cause6.
Two research teams pulled together the wider evidence in 2025.
The first, from a University of Edinburgh team, gathered 27 studies7. The one-time surveys among them told a fairly steady story: people who used trackers reported more restrictive dieting, more driven exercise, more muscle-building fixation and more disordered eating overall7. The experiments told a different one. There, the link didn’t appear, so the team called trackers a correlate of eating problems, with cause and direction still unknown7.
A second review, from Flinders University in Australia, covered 38 articles8. Young adults who used diet and fitness apps showed more disordered eating than those who didn’t, and the gap held for frequent users too8. In studies that asked users about their experiences, people described pressure to hit goals and feelings of guilt8. It, too, could not show cause8.
Apps may push some people toward rigid eating, or people already struggling may be drawn to apps. Both may be true. Either way, if you have an eating-disorder history or feel driven by your log, the app deserves caution.
The scale is fine for many people and hard on some
In 2016, a team including University of Sheffield psychologists pooled 29 tests of self-weighing and mental health9. Overall, weighing wasn’t linked with anxiety or depression, body image or disordered eating9. It had a small negative link with measures such as self-esteem, and the authors noted the picture may be worse in some circumstances than others9.
A 2015 review by University of Minnesota researchers looked at 20 articles and found a split10. Negative links showed up mainly among women and younger people. Adults with overweight who were in weight-loss treatment showed no link or a helpful one10.
The authors added that no one knows whether the good results in programs come from the weighing or the weight loss10.
So the scale looks low-risk for many adults in a structured program. For a teenager, a young woman with body worries or anyone with an eating-disorder history, it deserves a conversation with a clinician first.
Blood pressure and heart alerts: follow a schedule, not a worry
Home blood pressure is one of the most useful things to track if you have high blood pressure or are close to it. It also invites rechecking, because readings jump around.
The American Heart Association’s home routine, last reviewed in August 2025, fits on an index card11:
- When: the same time every day, on the schedule your clinician sets.
- Before: use the bathroom, and give up coffee, cigarettes and workouts for the prior half hour.
- Setup: rest quietly for five minutes or more, cuff on bare skin, arm resting at heart height.
- Readings: two of them, a minute apart, both written down.
One high number on its own isn’t an emergency, according to the AHA. Measure again, log it and let your clinician know11. If you see 180/120 or higher, wait at least a minute and recheck; if it stays that high, call your clinician at once11. Call 911 instead if a reading that high comes with chest or back pain, trouble breathing, numbness or weakness, a change in vision or difficulty speaking11.
You don’t need dozens of readings for a good picture. In a 2022 study of 567 adults by researchers in the Netherlands and at the University of Oxford, morning and evening readings for three days gave a reliable average12. (Each “reading” was the monitor’s average of three quick measurements.) A firm diagnosis of high blood pressure took about four and a half days12.
In that study, the first readings tended to be the highest, and numbers drifted down over time12. An early high number is a reason to keep to the schedule, not a reason to panic.
Watch alerts can stir the same cycle. In a 2024 study of 172 people with atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm), wearable users were more preoccupied with their symptoms13. One in five users felt anxious after irregular-rhythm alerts and always contacted their doctor13. Our smartwatch alerts article covers what those alerts can tell you.
Never stop or change blood pressure medicine based on home readings without talking to your clinician11.
A scale-back plan that puts your body first
Many people drawn to natural health value listening to the body: hunger, energy, mood, how a walk or a meal feels. That’s a skill, and no device replaces it. Numbers can sharpen it, but in the heart-rhythm study, more data came with more worry, not more peace13.
The frequencies below are starting points built from the guidance above, not tested prescriptions. Adjust them with your clinician.
| What you track | A healthier dose | Take a break if | Try this instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure | Two readings at the same time daily, on the days your clinician asks for | You measure again and again after a high number | Rest five minutes, take one more reading, write it down, put the cuff away |
| Weight | Once a week, same day and time | You skip meals or feel panic after weighing | Notice how clothes fit, your energy and your strength |
| Calories or food logs | A one- or two-week learning stretch, or log one habit such as vegetables at lunch | Foods vanish because they’re hard to log, or you feel guilt | Use a simple plate pattern and a hunger-and-fullness check |
| Steps and workouts | Look at the weekly total | You push through illness or injury to close a ring | Take some walks with the watch left at home |
| Sleep scores | Check a weekly average, not each night | Your sleep got worse after you started tracking | Judge by how you feel at 10 a.m. |
| Symptom searches | One search, one trusted source, one clear question | You search the same symptom three or more times | Write the question down for your next visit |
Then try these steps:
- Count for three days. Make a tally mark each time you check a number, app or symptom.
- Pick your keepers. Keep one or two numbers that answer a real question, such as whether a medicine is working.
- Set check times. Outside those times, the device stays in a drawer or the app stays closed.
- Turn off nonessential alerts. Move tracking apps off your home screen.
- Delay and notice. When the urge to check hits, write it down and wait, the same skill the Swedish therapy trained4. See whether the urge passes.
- Take a data holiday. Go one week without your least useful tracker, then ask whether you miss it.
Sometimes the most self-reliant choice is to put the device down and trust what you notice.
What the evidence shows
| Claim | Evidence rating | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|
| Repeated checking lowers confidence in memory | 28 lab experiments with 1,662 people; accuracy dipped only slightly2 | |
| Repeated body or health checking works the same way | Inference from lab tasks12 plus a health-anxiety model3 | |
| Health anxiety goes with more symptom searching and cyberchondria | Two reviews with consistent links; cause and direction unclear35 | |
| In surveys, diet and fitness app users report more disordered-eating symptoms | Two 2025 reviews of 27 and 38 studies, mostly one-time surveys78 | |
| Tracking apps cause eating disorders | Experiments haven’t found the link7 | |
| Self-weighing harms most adults’ mental health | 29 tests found no link with mood, body image or disordered eating9 | |
| Self-weighing can hurt some younger people and women | Mixed results across 20 articles10 | |
| A few days of scheduled home readings give a reliable blood pressure average | One study of 567 adults12, consistent with AHA advice11 | |
| Exposure-based CBT eases severe health anxiety | A randomized trial of 158 adults and earlier trials it summarizes4 |
When to get help
Over-monitoring can be part of something that needs care. Talk with a clinician or counselor if:
- You have cut out meals or whole food groups because of what your log says.
- You feel panic when you can’t weigh, log or check.
- You exercise through illness or injury to hit a target.
- Doctor visits or tests reassure you only briefly before the worry returns.
- You avoid medical care because you fear what a test might show.
- Checking eats up time you’d rather spend on work, family or rest.
Health anxiety responds to treatment. In the Swedish trial, 158 adults with severe health anxiety took a 12-week online program guided by a therapist4. Both programs helped, and exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a talk therapy that works on thoughts and habits together, helped more4. Gains held at six months4.
For food, weight or exercise worries, the National Alliance for Eating Disorders helpline is 1-866-662-123514. It isn’t a crisis line, but it connects callers with licensed therapists who specialize in eating disorders and can refer you to care, weekdays from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern14.
If you’re in distress or thinking about harming yourself, call or text 988, or chat at chat.988lifeline.org15. It’s free, confidential and open 24 hours a day15. For a blood pressure over 180/120 with warning symptoms, call 91111.
Questions readers ask
Should I stop tracking altogether?
Usually not, since tracking helps people reach health goals. Aim for the right dose: fewer numbers, checked on a schedule, tied to a question you care about.
My doctor asked me to log my blood pressure. Is that over-monitoring?
No, that’s a planned dose with a purpose. Follow the AHA routine of two readings one minute apart at the same time each day, and ask how many days your clinician wants11. Over-monitoring is the extra checks after a high number.
Are calorie apps safe if I’ve never had an eating disorder?
Research can’t show that apps cause eating disorders78. Watch for guilt, shrinking food choices or feeling driven by the log, and consider a short learning stretch instead of logging forever.
I search every new symptom. How do I break the habit?
For a mild symptom, write it down with the date and wait a day. If it’s still there, use one trusted source or call your clinician’s nurse line. A severe or sudden symptom calls for your clinician or 911, not a search. If you can’t stop searching, a therapist trained in CBT for health anxiety can help4.
The bottom line
Monitoring works like many good things: the right amount helps and too much backfires. In the lab, checking again and again leaves people less sure. In daily life, heavy checking travels with health anxiety, rigid eating and worry over normal ups and downs.
Keep the numbers that answer a real question, check them on a schedule and let your body’s own signals count. If checking starts running your days, reach out for help. That isn’t failure. It’s the same self-awareness that led you to track in the first place.
Related reading
About this article
This article was researched using peer-reviewed studies, systematic reviews and guidance from the American Heart Association, all listed below. It was reviewed in October 2026. It is general education, not medical, legal or financial advice.
Sources
- van den Hout M, Kindt M. “Repeated Checking Causes Memory Distrust.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2003;41(3):301-316. research-portal.uu.nl
- van den Hout MA, van Dis EAM, van Woudenberg C, van de Groep IH. “OCD-Like Checking in the Lab: A Meta-Analysis and Improvement of an Experimental Paradigm.” Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 2019;20:39-49. research-portal.uu.nl
- Schenkel SK, Jungmann SM, Gropalis M, Witthöft M. “Conceptualizations of Cyberchondria and Relations to the Anxiety Spectrum: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2021. bibliographie.ub.uni-mainz.de
- Hedman E, Axelsson E, Görling A, et al. “Internet-Delivered Exposure-Based Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Behavioural Stress Management for Severe Health Anxiety: Randomised Controlled Trial.” British Journal of Psychiatry, 2014;205(4):307-314. cambridge.org
- McMullan RD, Berle D, Arnáez S, Starcevic V. “The Relationships Between Health Anxiety, Online Health Information Seeking, and Cyberchondria: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Affective Disorders, 2019;245:270-278. researchers.mq.edu.au
- Levinson CA, Fewell L, Brosof LC. “My Fitness Pal Calorie Tracker Usage in the Eating Disorders.” Eating Behaviors, 2017;27:14-16. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Moody S, Ross L, Opitz M-C, et al. “Associations Between the Use of Fitness and Diet Tracking Technology and Disordered Eating Behaviour: A Systematic Review.” European Eating Disorders Review, 2025;33(6):1288-1313. research.ed.ac.uk
- Anderberg I, Kemps E, Prichard I. “The Link Between the Use of Diet and Fitness Monitoring Apps, Body Image and Disordered Eating Symptomology: A Systematic Review.” Body Image, 2025;52:101836. researchnow.flinders.edu.au
- Benn Y, Webb TL, Chang BPI, Harkin B. “What Is the Psychological Impact of Self-Weighing? A Meta-Analysis.” Health Psychology Review, 2016;10(2):187-203. eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
- Pacanowski CR, Linde JA, Neumark-Sztainer D. “Self-Weighing: Helpful or Harmful for Psychological Well-Being? A Review of the Literature.” Current Obesity Reports, 2015;4:65-72. link.springer.com
- American Heart Association. “Monitoring Your Blood Pressure at Home.” Last reviewed August 14, 2025. heart.org
- Groenland EH, Bots ML, Visseren FLJ, McManus RJ, Spiering W. “Number of Measurement Days Needed for Obtaining a Reliable Estimate of Home Blood Pressure and Hypertension Status.” Blood Pressure, 2022;31(1):100-108. researchinformation.umcutrecht.nl
- Rosman L, Lampert R, Zhuo S, et al. “Wearable Devices, Health Care Use, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.” Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024;13(15). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- National Alliance for Eating Disorders. Helpline information (homepage). Accessed October 2026. allianceforeatingdisorders.com
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. “988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.” Accessed October 2026. 988lifeline.org