Key takeaways
- In the Apple and Fitbit heart studies, which together enrolled nearly 875,000 people, only 1 in 200 to 1 in 100 got an irregular-rhythm alert, and about a third of those who wore a follow-up heart monitor had atrial fibrillation12.
- Cleared watch alerts are tuned to avoid false alarms, so they miss many cases: Apple’s high blood pressure feature flagged 41% of people with hypertension in its validation study5.
- A quiet watch is not a clean bill of health: a 2026 analysis in JAMA estimated that about 1 in 3 adults 60 and older with no alert would still have high blood pressure6.
- Fall detection meets a real need, since 80% of people over 90 who fell in a British study couldn’t get up alone at least once, but the best real-world test we found used older waist-worn sensors, which caught just 57% of real falls1415.
- After any alert, see a clinician, don’t change a medicine on your own, and call 911 for chest pain or stroke signs, because a watch ECG can’t detect a heart attack1013.
In September 2025, the Food and Drug Administration cleared an Apple Watch feature that looks for signs of high blood pressure4. It uses no cuff, reading data from the watch’s light sensor in the background and sending a notice when the pattern suggests hypertension5.
In the company’s validation study, filed with the FDA, 1,863 adults had enough data to analyze. Of the people who had high blood pressure, 41% got the alert. The other 59% got nothing5.
That isn’t a scandal but a design choice. The feature was built so that people with normal blood pressure rarely get a false alarm, and 92% of them got no alert5. The trade-off is that a silent watch tells you very little.
This pattern shows up across the newest medical alerts on smartwatches. When a cleared alert fires, it’s often right. When it stays quiet, you’ve learned less than you might think.
For people who like to keep watch over their own health, that matters. A watch can be an early-warning helper, but it can’t be your checkup. Below, we look at what the big studies found, what each alert can do, and how to respond when your wrist buzzes.
A few watch features are medical devices, but the rest are wellness estimates
A smartwatch is really two products in one case. A handful of features have been reviewed by the FDA for one specific medical job. Everything else, from step counts to stress scores, is sold as a wellness estimate. Our guide “FDA Registered” Isn’t “FDA Approved” explains what each of those labels means.
The FDA keeps a public list of cleared sensor features. Here are the main ones you’ll find on watches today4.
| Feature | What it does | Examples on the FDA list |
|---|---|---|
| ECG app | Records a one-lead heart tracing and sorts it as AFib or normal rhythm | Apple (2018), Fitbit and Samsung (2020), Garmin (2023), WHOOP (2025)4 |
| Irregular rhythm notifications | Checks your pulse in the background and alerts you to a pattern that suggests AFib | Apple (versions cleared in 2021 and 2023), Fitbit (2022), Samsung (2023)4 |
| Sleep apnea notification | Looks for breathing disturbances during sleep and flags possible moderate to severe sleep apnea | Samsung (February 2024), Apple (September 2024)48 |
| Loss of pulse detection | If your pulse seems to stop and you don’t respond, it tries to prompt an emergency call | Fitbit (February 2025)49 |
| Hypertension notification | Flags patterns that suggest undiagnosed high blood pressure, with no blood pressure numbers shown | Apple (September 2025)457 |
The FDA says this list is not complete4. Even so, it’s telling that it includes no fall detection feature and no blood-oxygen feature from the major watch brands4. Those features may be useful, but don’t assume they’ve had the same review for a medical claim.
Clearance also comes with fine print. Most of these features are for adults 22 and older, while Apple’s sleep apnea feature starts at 1858910.
The hypertension feature isn’t meant for people already diagnosed with high blood pressure or for use during pregnancy5. The ECG app isn’t meant to judge rhythm problems other than AFib10.
The two giant heart studies: alerts were rare, and usually right
Atrial fibrillation, or AFib, is an irregular and often fast rhythm in the heart’s upper chambers. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says it raises the risk of ischemic stroke, the kind caused by a blockage, about fivefold and causes about 1 in 7 strokes12. Some people with AFib have no symptoms at all12. That’s the promise of a wrist alert: catching a silent problem early.
Two studies tested that promise at enormous scale.
The apple heart study. Stanford researchers enrolled 419,297 people over eight months. Only 0.52% got an irregular pulse notification, and age made a big difference1. About 3.1% of people 65 and older got one, compared with 0.16% of those ages 22 to 391.
People who got an alert were offered an ECG patch, a stick-on heart monitor. Only 450 sent back a usable patch. AFib showed up in 34% of them, but in just 18% of those under 401. When an alert went off while the patch was on, the patch confirmed AFib 84% of the time1.
The Fitbit heart study. Researchers led by Steven Lubitz enrolled 455,699 people in 20202. About 1% got an alert, rising to 4% of people 65 and older. Among 1,057 who wore a patch afterward, 32% had AFib2. When 225 people got another alert while wearing the patch, 221 of them were in AFib at that moment, or 98%2.
Lubitz said most undiagnosed AFib episodes happened during sleep, so the device works best if you wear it to bed3.
Both studies had company sponsors. Apple paid for its study and owns the data, though Stanford statisticians ran the analysis on their own1. Fitbit sponsored its study3.
Neither study compared people who got alerts with similar people who didn’t. So neither can tell us whether the alerts prevent strokes13. The Apple team also noted that its algorithm wasn’t built to catch short AFib episodes1.
Built to avoid false alarms, so silence proves little
Sensitivity is the share of people with a condition who get flagged. Specificity is the share of people without it who correctly get no alert.
Newer watch alerts lean hard toward specificity, so they rarely cry wolf. The cost is that they miss a lot. This is what the companies reported to the FDA.
| Alert | Share of true cases flagged | Share of healthy people correctly left alone | What the FDA filing says |
|---|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure (Apple, 2025) | 41% | 92% | No alert doesn’t mean you don’t have hypertension5 |
| Moderate to severe sleep apnea (Apple, 2024) | 66% | 98.5% | No alert doesn’t mean you don’t have sleep apnea8 |
| Loss of pulse (Fitbit, 2025) | 69% | 99.97% of days | It isn’t meant to catch every event9 |
The blood pressure feature did worse in some groups. It caught fewer cases in adults under 60 and in people with a body mass index of 30 or less5.
In February 2026, researchers writing in the journal JAMA put these numbers to work. They applied the FDA figures to national health survey data that represent about 127 million U.S. adults who haven’t been told they have high blood pressure6. Among people who would get an alert, about 69% would truly have hypertension6.
The worrying part was the silence. With no alert, the chance of still having high blood pressure was 10% for adults under 30 and 34% for those 60 and older6. The authors warned that false reassurance could keep some people from getting checked6.
Houston Methodist, a hospital system in Houston, adds a practical point: the watch shows no blood pressure numbers and can’t do a spot check on demand7. Eleonora Avenatti, a cardiac prevention specialist there, says an alert should lead to a reading on a medical-grade device and a talk with a physician7. So the feature can’t replace a cuff. It can only nudge you to use one.
Fall detection meets a real need, but the proof is still thin
A fall is dangerous, but being stuck on the floor afterward can be worse.
For a year, British researchers tracked 110 Cambridge residents over age 9014. Six in ten had at least one fall. Among the fallers, 80% had a fall they couldn’t get up from alone, and 30% waited on the floor for an hour or more at least once.
Call alarms were common in this group, yet in most of those long waits nobody pressed one. The long waits went along with serious injuries, hospital admissions and moves into care homes14.
That’s the case for automatic fall detection: you don’t have to press anything.
The catch is that lab results can flatter these systems. In a 2012 study, an international team tested 13 published fall-detection methods on 29 real falls recorded by body-worn sensors15. Most of the falls came from patients with a rare neurological disease and a high risk of falling.
On average the methods caught 57% of the falls, far below the near-perfect results often reported on falls staged by healthy volunteers15. Over a day of monitoring, they also raised 3 to 85 false alarms, depending on the method15.
Those sensors sat on the waist or lower back, not the wrist, and they ran research methods from 2012 or earlier, so the numbers don’t describe any watch sold today. We found no independent real-world test of watch fall detection to take their place. The lesson carries over, though. A feature that works in a demonstration may miss a slow slide out of a chair.
Treat watch fall detection as a helpful backup, not a guarantee. If you live alone, pair it with a daily check-in call or a neighbor who knows your routine.
When the alert itself becomes the problem
Alerts can also cause harm of a quieter kind.
In 2024, researchers at the University of North Carolina compared 172 people with AFib, average age 73. About half used a wearable11. Over nine months, wearable users were more preoccupied with their heart symptoms and more worried about their AFib treatment11.
One in five users felt anxious after irregular rhythm alerts and always contacted their doctor11. Users also had more AFib-related tests and procedures, and they called and messaged their clinics more11. The study can’t say whether those visits helped or were needed, and the authors called for randomized trials to weigh the net effect11.
The Apple study saw the same pull toward care. Of notified people who answered a survey, 57% contacted an outside health provider1.
Some of that care is good, and some of it may be worry turned into appointments. If alerts leave you checking your wrist all day, that’s a reason to talk with your clinician about which ones you need.
What to do when your watch sends an alert
Decide your plan before the alert, not during it, and review this starting plan with your clinician.
| If your watch says | Do this soon | Call 911 instead if |
|---|---|---|
| Irregular rhythm or possible AFib | Note the time and how you feel. If your watch has an ECG app, take a reading and save it. Book a visit and bring the record. In both big studies, follow-up meant a stick-on ECG patch12. | You have chest pain or pressure, or any sign of stroke1013; also fainting or severe shortness of breath |
| Possible high blood pressure | Check with a validated, medical-grade cuff and share the readings with a clinician7 | You have chest pain or stroke signs13 |
| Possible sleep apnea | Bring the alert to your clinician. The notice is not a diagnosis or a replacement for a sleep study8. | You have severe trouble breathing |
| Loss of pulse or a hard fall | If you’re fine, cancel the call. If someone else is unresponsive, call 911 yourself. | Anyone is unresponsive, badly hurt or can’t get up |
Three rules apply to every alert. Don’t stop or change a medicine because of a watch reading10. Don’t let a normal-looking watch ECG talk you out of care, because the FDA label for Apple’s ECG app says plainly, “It cannot detect heart attacks”10. And learn the stroke signs: sudden face drooping, arm weakness, trouble speaking, trouble seeing or loss of balance mean call 911 and note the time13.
What the evidence supports, feature by feature
How the research stacks up, using four levels: strong evidence, promising but early, not enough evidence, and evidence says no.
| Claim | Rating | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Irregular rhythm alerts usually reflect real AFib when they fire | Two studies of more than 400,000 people each12 | |
| Getting AFib alerts prevents strokes or deaths | The big studies had no comparison group; researchers have called for randomized trials111 | |
| A hypertension notification finds undiagnosed high blood pressure | Caught 41% in the maker’s study; real-world use not yet tested56 | |
| A sleep apnea notification finds moderate to severe apnea | Caught 66% in the maker’s study, with very few false alarms8 | |
| Watch fall detection reliably catches real-life falls | No independent real-world watch test found; older waist-worn detectors caught 57% of real falls15 | |
| No alert means you’re healthy | Cleared features miss a third to more than half of true cases568 | |
| A watch ECG can spot a heart attack | The FDA label says it can’t10 |
Your body’s signals still come first
Many people buy a smartwatch because they believe in prevention and want to know their own bodies. That instinct is sound. The watch is best used to support it, not replace it.
The CDC lists the habits and conditions tied to AFib: high blood pressure, which is linked to about 1 in 5 cases, along with obesity, diabetes, moderate to heavy drinking and smoking12. Most of those respond to daily choices about food, movement, alcohol and tobacco. A watch can’t make those choices. It can remind you why they matter.
Your own sensations count, too. Fatigue, a fluttering or pounding heartbeat, lightheadedness and shortness of breath are AFib symptoms worth reporting, with or without an alert12.
The same skepticism readers bring to drug-company research belongs here. Hold the marketing to the evidence, and the evidence so far shows watches catching problems, not improving health.
Questions readers ask
Should I buy a smartwatch just to screen for AFib?
It depends a lot on age. In the Apple study, about 3% of people 65 and older got an alert, compared with 0.16% of adults under 40, and only 18% of younger people who were checked had AFib1. Neither big study tested whether watch alerts prevent strokes13. If you’re older or have risk factors, ask your clinician whether rhythm checks make sense for you.
Can my watch tell me if I’m having a heart attack?
No. The FDA label for Apple’s ECG app says it can’t detect heart attacks and tells users to call emergency services for chest pain or pressure10. A normal watch reading should never delay that call.
My watch has never alerted me. Does that mean my heart and blood pressure are fine?
No. The cleared hypertension and sleep apnea features missed a third to more than half of true cases in their own studies58. Keep up regular checks with a cuff and your clinician67.
Can I trust studies the watch companies paid for?
Treat them as you would a drug-company trial: useful, but worth checking. Apple funded its study, though Stanford statisticians analyzed the data independently1. The 2026 JAMA analysis came from university researchers, but it had to rely on the company’s reported accuracy6.
The bottom line
A smartwatch alert deserves attention. When a cleared AFib alert fires, it’s often right, and a clinician can confirm it with a proper heart recording. When the watch stays quiet, though, it hasn’t cleared you of anything. The newest alerts are built to avoid false alarms, so they miss many real cases.
Use the watch as a backup to habits and checkups, not a stand-in for them. Make an alert plan ahead of time, keep your cuff and your clinician in the loop, and let chest pain or stroke signs send you to 911 no matter what your wrist says.
Keep exploring: digital therapeutics, interpreting wearable data, fitness tracker accuracy and wellness devices FDA.
Related reading
About this article
This article was researched from FDA device records, CDC pages, and peer-reviewed studies, all listed below. It was reviewed in October 2026 and is general education, not medical, legal or financial advice..
Sources
- Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, et al. “Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation.” New England Journal of Medicine, 2019 (full text via eScholarship). escholarship.org
- Lubitz SA, Faranesh AZ, Selvaggi C, et al. “Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in a Large Population Using Wearable Devices: The Fitbit Heart Study.” Circulation, 2022 (abstract via UMass Chan repository). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- HCPLive. “Fitbit Heart Study Provides Further Backing for Wearables in Detecting AFib.” November 15, 2021. hcplive.com
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Medical Devices that Incorporate Sensor-based Digital Health Technology.” Updated September 2026. fda.gov
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary K250507, Hypertension Notification Feature (Apple Inc.). September 2025. accessdata.fda.gov
- Cohen JB, Addo DK, Jacobs JA, et al. “Impact of a Smartwatch Hypertension Notification Feature for Population Screening.” JAMA, February 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Houston Methodist. “Smartwatch Hypertension Notifications: How Seriously Should You Take It?” On Health blog, May 12, 2026. houstonmethodist.org
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary K240929, Sleep Apnea Notification Feature (Apple Inc.). September 2024. accessdata.fda.gov
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary K242967, Loss of Pulse Detection (Fitbit). February 2025. accessdata.fda.gov
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. De Novo Decision Summary DEN180044, ECG App (Apple Inc.). 2018. accessdata.fda.gov
- Rosman L, Lampert R, Zhuo S, et al. “Wearable Devices, Health Care Use, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.” Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024 (abstract via DOAJ). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “About Atrial Fibrillation.” 2024. cdc.gov
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Stroke Signs and Symptoms.” 2026. cdc.gov
- Fleming J, Brayne C. “Inability to Get Up After Falling, Subsequent Time on Floor, and Summoning Help: Prospective Cohort Study in People Over 90.” BMJ, 2008. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- BagalĂ F, Becker C, Cappello A, et al. “Evaluation of Accelerometer-Based Fall Detection Algorithms on Real-World Falls.” PLOS ONE, 2012. journals.plos.org