Your rheumatologist has adjusted your arthritis medicines twice this year, and the blood tests look calmer. Then, at the end of a visit, comes a referral to a psychologist. The thought arrives before you can stop it: so they think the pain is in my head.
They almost certainly don’t. In its 2022 guideline on integrative care, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) conditionally recommended cognitive behavioral therapy or mind-body approaches for rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease that visibly damages joints. Its osteoarthritis update, posted in September 2026, conditionally recommends cognitive behavioral therapy for arthritis of the knee, hip and hand. These treatments sit beside medical care for conditions whose physical basis nobody disputes.
The opposite story circulates too: a newer therapy after which two in three people with chronic back pain said they were pain-free or nearly so. Both stories miss what the evidence shows. The best-tested psychological treatments for chronic pain do help, mostly modestly, and mostly with how much pain disrupts mood, sleep and daily life rather than how much it hurts. That modesty is the honest story, and knowing it helps you pick a treatment and judge whether it is working.
A referral isn’t a verdict that the pain is imaginary
The ACR’s rheumatoid arthritis panel didn’t oversell. It found very low to low certainty evidence of no consistent improvement in pain or physical function from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mind-body approaches. What did improve, on low to moderate certainty evidence, were depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep. The panel recommended the approaches anyway, conditionally, a grade that in its framework leaves the choice to each patient’s preferences.
That is the shape of the whole field. These therapies target the parts of living with pain that medicine often leaves alone: dread before a flare, activities dropped, nights spent awake rehearsing the worst. The largest review of them pooled trials mostly in people with fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, rheumatoid arthritis and mixed chronic pain, not a group picked for doubtful symptoms. Why a nervous system can hurt without matching tissue damage, and why that doesn’t make pain fake, is the subject of our explainer on how pain is produced.
Five approaches in plain language
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) teaches skills for changing the thoughts and habits that make pain harder to live with. Typical targets include pacing activity, setting goals and testing predictions like if I walk today, I’ll pay for it all week. It is by far the most studied option.
Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) trains people to notice sensations, thoughts and feelings without reacting to them, usually through meditation plus gentle yoga, often in an eight-week group course.
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) stops trying to win a fight with pain. It builds willingness to have unpleasant sensations while still doing what matters to you, a skill researchers call psychological flexibility.
Emotional awareness and expression therapy (EAET) focuses on emotions tied to adversity, trauma and unresolved conflict, which its developers regard as risk factors in conditions such as fibromyalgia. It encourages people to experience and express those emotions.
Pain reprocessing therapy (PRT) aims to change beliefs about what causes pain and how threatening it is, teaching people to see it as nondangerous brain activity rather than tissue injury. It opens with pain-science education, which our article on pain and damage covers, and targets what researchers call primary or nociplastic pain, a label our central sensitization piece examines.
Hypnosis and relaxation training sit close by; earlier entries in this series graded each on its own record.
What the biggest reviews found
CBT: small benefits, measured many times
The most thorough summary is a 2020 Cochrane review led by Amanda C de C Williams of University College London. It pooled 75 randomized trials with 9,401 participants, 59 of them testing CBT. Its conclusion is worth reading in the reviewers’ own words: “CBT has small or very small beneficial effects for reducing pain, disability, and distress in chronic pain…”
The size depends on the comparison. Against usual care or a waiting list, CBT’s benefits were small, and they largely held 6 to 12 months later. Against an active comparison treatment, the edge shrank to very small and did not hold at follow-up. The reviewers also noted that most trials recorded side effects poorly, so the evidence on harms is thin rather than reassuring.
A 2025 Cochrane overview of back pain treatments adds a number for a broader category. In two trials of psychological therapies that included relaxation and behavioral approaches, people with chronic low back pain probably had about 5 points less pain on a 100-point scale than with usual care, and probably no difference in function. For comparison, exercise therapies probably lowered pain by about 15 points against no treatment or usual care.
One trial, read closely
A 2016 JAMA trial led by Daniel C Cherkin at Group Health in Washington State assigned 342 adults with chronic low back pain to MBSR, CBT or usual care. At 26 weeks, the share reporting at least 30% less bothersome pain was 43.6% with MBSR, 44.9% with CBT and 26.6% with usual care. The two therapies did not differ, and MBSR’s gains largely held at a year.
Read the other way, roughly one extra person in five or six improved meaningfully with either therapy, and more than half of those in therapy did not reach that mark. Only 53.7% attended at least six of the eight sessions. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), in a page last updated in January 2023, likewise reports no important difference between mindfulness-based approaches and CBT.
ACT: promising, poorly proven
ACT’s trial record is thinner than its popularity. In the Cochrane review, five trials comparing ACT with an active control found no clear difference, and the two trials against usual care were rated very low quality. A 2026 meta-analysis of 60 trials in the European Journal of Pain found that acceptance- and mindfulness-based programs did raise psychological flexibility and pain acceptance. Those are the skills the therapy teaches, not pain itself, and the authors rated most trials at high risk of bias, with low to very low certainty.
Graded the way this library grades evidence, CBT for pain carries recommendations by name in several guidelines, and what it delivers is real but small. MBSR is named by the physicians’ guideline and in the CDC’s supporting text, and left neutral by the veterans’ guideline, as the table below shows. For ACT, the evidence is still insufficient.
The newer therapies behind the big headlines
Pain reprocessing therapy
The two-in-three figure comes from a 2022 trial in JAMA Psychiatry led by Yoni K Ashar, run with a community sample in Boulder, Colorado. It randomized 151 adults with chronic back pain to PRT, to an open-label placebo injection of saline in the back, or to usual care. PRT meant one telehealth evaluation with a physician who reviewed any existing spine imaging, then eight one-hour sessions over four weeks.
After treatment, 66% of the PRT group rated their pain 0 or 1 out of 10, compared with 20% of the placebo group and 10% of the usual care group. A year later, average pain stood at 1.5 with PRT against 2.8 and 3.0 in the comparison groups. Those are unusually large differences for a psychological treatment.
The fine print matters just as much. Average pain at the start was about 4 out of 10. No participant’s education had stopped at high school, 70% to 78% per group held a college degree, and 86% to 92% were White. The two therapists, both co-authors, had extensive experience with the method. The authors put it plainly: “The study sample was relatively well educated and active and reported long-standing low to moderate pain and disability at baseline.” The trial did not compare PRT with CBT or other leading treatments, a test the authors themselves called for.
Later reports cut both ways. In a March 2026 news story, the University of Colorado Anschutz reported that five years on, more than half the PRT group remained pain-free or nearly so. Ashar also acknowledged that the original sample was homogeneous and said a follow-up trial is under way. A 2026 pilot turned PRT into eight weekly telehealth group sessions for 46 veterans with back or neck pain. On a 10-point pain scale, scores fell about 1.5 points from an average of 6.4 right after treatment and about 0.9 points two months later. There was no comparison group.
The trial also built in a safeguard that is easy to lose in retelling. It enrolled people whose pain was judged primary and excluded those whose leg pain was worse than their back pain. A physician assessed each PRT participant and reviewed existing imaging first. Reframing pain as brain-generated before anyone has examined it risks overlooking a treatable cause.
Emotional awareness and expression therapy
A 2024 trial in JAMA Network Open at the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System compared EAET with CBT in 126 veterans aged 60 to 95, 92% of them men. After treatment, 63% of the EAET group reported at least 30% less pain, against 17% with CBT, and EAET also did better on anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms. People with more depression, anxiety or PTSD symptoms at the start gained the most from EAET.
An earlier test points the other way. In a 2017 trial of 230 adults with fibromyalgia published in Pain, EAET did not beat a basic education program on its main measure, pain severity. It did better than education on several secondary measures, matched CBT on most outcomes, and more participants reached a 50% pain reduction with EAET than with CBT.
For both PRT and EAET, the library’s verdict is positive evidence with a contested interpretation: striking results, but from few trials and narrow samples.
Where guidelines agree, and where they split
| Guideline (year) | What it says | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| American College of Physicians, low back pain (2017) | For chronic low back pain, begin with a nondrug option from a list including MBSR (moderate-quality evidence) and CBT (low-quality evidence) | Strong, for choosing from the list |
| VA and Department of Defense, low back pain (2022) | Suggests CBT for chronic low back pain; insufficient evidence for or against MBSR | Weak for CBT; neither for nor against MBSR |
| CDC, opioid prescribing (2022) | Nonopioid therapies preferred for subacute and chronic pain; supporting text names psychological therapy and MBSR for low back pain, CBT and mindfulness for fibromyalgia | Category A, evidence type 2, for the overall recommendation |
| ACR, rheumatoid arthritis (2022) | CBT and/or mind-body approaches over none | Conditional |
| ACR, osteoarthritis (2026 update) | CBT for knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis | Conditional, low certainty |
The split over MBSR is genuine: the physicians’ group and the federal veterans’ panel published five years apart and read the evidence differently. None of the US guidelines reviewed here names ACT, EAET or PRT.
One federal action sits outside the guideline system. In 2023 the Food and Drug Administration authorized a prescription smartphone app that delivers ACT for adults with fibromyalgia symptoms, and our fibromyalgia article details its trial. The agency’s decision summary rules it out for people with severe, untreated depression or a risk of self-harm, a reminder that even a talk-therapy tool comes with screening rules.
Getting it: shortages, coverage and shorter formats
A September 2024 report to Congress from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) points out that pain psychology is not a recognized specialty of the American Psychological Association. The report ties that lack of formal certification to the low availability of these specialists. It adds that most primary care clinicians get no training in behavioral treatments such as CBT.
Coverage is a maze. According to the CMS report, Medicare can pay for CBT as psychotherapy for people with a diagnosed mental disorder. Revisions in 2020 to its health and behavior assessment and intervention codes also made it easier to pay for CBT aimed at physical health problems, including ones that cause pain, without a mental health diagnosis. Yet some groups consulted for the report described therapy being covered, just not for a pain diagnosis. Private plans have their own rules, so the billing question is worth asking before the first session.
Shorter and remote formats have some trial support:
- One class. A 2021 Stanford trial in JAMA Network Open enrolled 263 adults with chronic low back pain. It compared a single two-hour class, blending pain education, mindfulness and CBT skills, with eight two-hour CBT sessions and with a two-hour health education class. Three months later the class matched full CBT on its main outcome, catastrophizing, and on pain intensity, pain interference, sleep and mood, though not on physical function. Nearly all participants (97.7%) had some college education, people with suicidal thoughts or severe depression were excluded, and follow-up stopped at three months. The fight over the word catastrophizing gets a full airing in our article on why symptoms persist.
- Video and phone sessions. A 2024 meta-analysis of 54 trials in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, six of them in chronic pain or fatigue conditions, found little to no difference between therapist-guided remote CBT and in-person CBT.
- Self-paced mindfulness. The 2024 LAMP trial in 811 veterans at three VA facilities tested an eight-week mindfulness program by videoconference or at the participant’s own pace with three coaching calls. Both beat usual care, lowering pain interference by 0.4 to 0.7 points on a 10-point scale, averaged over a year, with gains in pain intensity, fatigue, sleep, depression and PTSD symptoms. Modest, but achieved with recorded teaching instead of a live local instructor.
Questions to ask before you start
- What is this method, and how many sessions? Ask too whether it was tested in people with your kind of pain.
- What is your training in pain? With no recognized specialty, a license plus pain-focused training and experience is the best signal.
- What are we trying to change? Agree on a target, such as walking farther or sleeping better, and how you’ll track it.
- Has the physical side been examined? This matters most before any approach that reframes pain as a false alarm.
- How will it be billed? Ask whether your plan pays under a pain diagnosis or needs a mental health diagnosis.
- What if my mood gets worse? A good program has a plan for rising distress, including thoughts of self-harm.
Whether a single class, a full course of CBT or one of the newer therapies fits you is a decision to make with the clinician who manages your pain.
When to get help right away
Long-lasting pain and dark thoughts often travel together. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states in its 2022 opioid guideline that suicidal thoughts and behaviors are more likely in people living with chronic pain. A 2018 analysis by CDC researchers looked at 123,181 suicide deaths in 18 states between 2003 and 2014. They found evidence of chronic pain in 8.8% of them, a share that rose from 7.4% to 10.2% over those years, and they judged even those figures likely to be undercounts.
If pain has brought on hopelessness or thoughts of suicide, you can call or text 988 to reach the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, or use its online chat. Conversations are free and confidential, and the line is open around the clock. If someone is in immediate danger, call 911.
Other situations call for a prompt conversation with a clinician rather than a wait for the next therapy session:
- Depression, anxiety or trauma symptoms layered on pain. They are worth raising directly, since in at least one trial they changed which therapy helped most.
- Pain that is new, changing or different from before. It deserves an examination before anyone recasts it as a learned alarm. The red flags that turn back pain into an urgent visit, such as new weakness in a leg or trouble controlling bladder or bowels, are set out in our guide to acute and chronic pain.
- Anxiety that climbs during relaxation or meditation practice. Our relaxation entry describes this paradoxical reaction and who is prone to it.
The Takeaway
Psychological treatment for chronic pain is a real, guideline-backed option, and its usual effect is modest: a little less pain on average, with clearer gains in mood, sleep and coping for many people. The newer therapies post bigger numbers, so far in narrower groups of patients. The most useful step is to decide what you most want to change, then ask any therapist or program how they will measure it. A treatment that helps you sleep and move more can be worth having even if the pain score barely shifts.
Sources
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. “Williams ACC, Fisher E, Hearn L, Eccleston C. "Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults." Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020;8(8):CD007407. PubMed. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub4.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. “Rizzo RR, Cashin AG, Wand BM, et al. "Non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane reviews." Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2025;3(3):CD014691. PubMed. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014691.pub2.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- JAMA. “Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, et al. "Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA, 2016;315(12):1240-9. PubMed. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.2323.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. “Chronic Pain and Complementary Health Approaches: Usefulness and Safety (last updated January 2023).” nccih.nih.gov
- European Journal of Pain. “Sanabria-Mazo JP, Rodríguez-Freire C, Royuela-Colomer E, et al. "Do Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Psychological Flexibility in People With Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." Eur J Pain, 2026;30(7):e70342. PubMed. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.70342.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- JAMA Psychiatry. “Ashar YK, Gordon A, Schubiner H, et al. "Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA Psychiatry, 2022;79(1):13-23. PubMed. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. “Pain reprocessing therapy reduces chronic back pain for years, study finds (news story, March 16, 2026).” news.cuanschutz.edu
- The Journal of Pain. “Wynia Z, Gasienica J, Amondson R, et al. "Group-format pain reprocessing therapy in veterans with chronic back/neck pain: A pilot study with mixed methods evaluation." J Pain, 2026;45:106322. PubMed. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106322.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- JAMA Network Open. “Yarns BC, Jackson NJ, Alas A, Melrose RJ, Lumley MA, Sultzer DL. "Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain in Older Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA Netw Open, 2024;7(6):e2415842. PubMed. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15842.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Pain. “Lumley MA, Schubiner H, Lockhart NA, et al. "Emotional awareness and expression therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and education for fibromyalgia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial." Pain, 2017;158(12):2354-2363. PubMed. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001036.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Annals of Internal Medicine. “Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. "Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians." Ann Intern Med, 2017;166(7):514-530. PubMed. DOI: 10.7326/M16-2367.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense. “VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain, Version 3.0: Provider Summary (February 2022).” healthquality.va.gov
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain, United States, 2022 (MMWR Recommendations and Reports 2022;71(3):1-95).” cdc.gov
- Arthritis & Rheumatology. “England BR, Smith BJ, Baker NA, et al. "2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for Exercise, Rehabilitation, Diet, and Additional Integrative Interventions for Rheumatoid Arthritis." Arthritis Rheumatol, 2023;75(8):1299-1311. PubMed. DOI: 10.1002/art.42507.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- American College of Rheumatology. “2026 Update of the American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Hip, and Hand (guideline summary, approved September 8, 2026).” assets.contentstack.io
- US Food and Drug Administration. “FDA Roundup: May 12, 2023.” fda.gov
- US Food and Drug Administration. “De Novo Classification Request for Stanza (DEN220083), decision summary.” accessdata.fda.gov
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. “Dr. Todd Graham Pain Management Study, Final Report (Report to Congress, September 2024).” cms.gov
- JAMA Network Open. “Darnall BD, Roy A, Chen AL, et al. "Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA Netw Open, 2021;4(8):e2113401. PubMed. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- CMAJ. “Zandieh S, Abdollahzadeh SM, Sadeghirad B, et al. "Therapist-guided remote versus in-person cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." CMAJ, 2024;196(10):E327-E340. PubMed. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230274.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- JAMA Internal Medicine. “Burgess DJ, Calvert C, Hagel Campbell EM, et al. "Telehealth Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Chronic Pain: The LAMP Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA Intern Med, 2024;184(10):1163-1173. PubMed. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3940.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Annals of Internal Medicine. “Petrosky E, Harpaz R, Fowler KA, et al. "Chronic Pain Among Suicide Decedents, 2003 to 2014: Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System." Ann Intern Med, 2018;169(7):448-455. PubMed. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0830.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. “988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (home page).” 988lifeline.org